Author: Andrei Bilog M.Sc., CAPM
In healthcare and biotech, prestige can quietly become a currency.
Students chase admission into top medical schools. Researchers aim for high-impact journals. Professionals pursue prestigious institutions, titles, and fellowships.
None of these goals are inherently bad. In fact, ambition drives innovation and excellence in science.
But there is a hidden psychological cost when prestige stops being a goal and starts becoming part of your identity.
For many students and professionals, the pressure to maintain a prestigious trajectory becomes one of the biggest sources of stressāand sometimes even anxiety about self-worth.
Letās talk about why. š§
š The Prestige Economy of Science and Healthcare
Healthcare and biotech are fields deeply tied to reputation.
Think about how often we hear phrases like:
āTop-tier institutionā
āHigh-impact publicationā
āElite residency programā
āPrestigious labā
These signals matter in competitive environments. But they also create what researchers sometimes call a prestige hierarchy, where individuals constantly compare themselves with others in the same field.
Social comparison theory explains that people evaluate their own success relative to peers, which can trigger feelings of inadequacy or competitiveness when others appear more successful (Festinger, 1954; see overview in social comparison research). (Wikipedia)
In other words:
When everyone around you is impressive, it becomes easy to feel like you're not.
This is why students entering highly competitive programs often experience the āfrog pond effect.ā
Even strong performers can begin to see themselves as weaker simply because they are surrounded by other high achievers. (Wikipedia)
The result?
Stress tied not to performanceābut to identity.
š§ When Prestige Becomes Identity Pressure
A psychological framework called self-discrepancy theory helps explain this pressure.
According to the theory, stress and emotional discomfort occur when there is a gap between:
who we are,
who we think we should be, and
who we think others expect us to be. (Wikipedia)
Prestige chasing often widens this gap.
For example, a student might start thinking:
āIf I donāt get into a top program, I failed.ā
āIf my research doesnāt get published in a high-impact journal, Iām not good enough.ā
āIf Iām not advancing faster than my peers, Iām falling behind.ā
Over time, achievements stop feeling like accomplishments and start feeling like requirements for belonging.
Research on academic environments has shown that prestige-driven cultures can intensify psychological stress, especially for students and early-career researchers navigating competitive systems. (ASEE Peer)
And that stress is already widespread.
The Healthy Minds Survey found that 37% of college students report anxiety and 44% report depression symptoms, with most saying mental health difficulties affect their academic performance. (The Hechinger Report)
This dynamic is particularly strong in scientific fields.
Healthcare and biotech often reward signals of excellence such as:
prestigious affiliations
funding success
publications
awards
institutional reputation
These signals matter for hiring and funding.
But they also create a culture where professionals feel that their identity is tied to status markers.
Studies examining status-seeking behavior suggest that the pursuit of prestige can influence stress levels and health outcomes, particularly when individuals link their personal worth to social rank. (PubMed)
In practical terms, this means:
The more someone equates their value with their credentials, the more fragile their self-worth becomes.
šØāš« A Personal Reflection
As someone who works in biotech and teaches anatomy and physiology, I see this dynamic from both sides.
When I was a student, I thought success meant checking certain boxes:
the right university
the right research experience
the right career path
And to some extent, those things do open doors.
But over time, I realized something important.
Many of the most capable scientists and healthcare professionals Iāve met didnāt succeed because of prestige.
They succeeded because they were:
curious
resilient
collaborative
committed to solving real problems
In other words, their identity was tied to purpose, not prestige.
That shift made a huge difference for me.
Instead of asking:
āIs this impressive enough?ā
I started asking:
āAm I learning something meaningful?ā
š Reframing Success
Prestige can be a signal, but it should never be the foundation of identity.
A healthier approach is focusing on things you control:
developing real skills
building meaningful relationships
contributing to science or patient care
staying curious and adaptable
Psychological research shows that reflecting on personal valuesāa concept known as self-affirmationācan reduce stress and help individuals maintain a stable sense of identity even in competitive environments. (Wikipedia)
In other words:
When your identity is rooted in values, external rankings matter less.
š” Takeaway for Students and Early Professionals
Prestige can open doorsābut it should never define your worth.
The healthcare and biotech fields need people who are:
thoughtful
ethical
resilient
collaborative
genuinely curious about solving problems
Those qualities rarely show up on a ranking list.
But they are the ones that build long careers and meaningful contributions to science and medicine.
So if you ever feel like youāre falling behind because someone else has a more impressive rĆ©sumĆ©ā¦
Remember this:
Your career is not a ranking system.
Itās a long-term contribution to something bigger than yourself.
And that kind of success rarely shows up in prestige metrics. š§¬
Disclaimer: This article was assisted by AI-based language tools (ChatGPT, OpenAI) for drafting and organization. All content was reviewed by the author, and all claims are supported by peer-reviewed sources.
References
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117ā140.
Knight, E. L., et al. (2022). Trait dominance and prestige differentially associate with stress and health outcomes. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 8, 346ā360.
Lisnyj, K. T., et al. (2021). Application of the socio-ecological model for health promotion in post-secondary students. Health Promotion International, 36(3).
Robert, K., Deters, J., & Leydens, J. (2024). The prestige game: Making visible the mental health effects of institutional prestige seeking on STEM students. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319ā340.
Healthy Minds Network. (2023). National college student mental health survey findings.
More about Andrei Bilog
A dedicated professional and educator, serving as the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of UPkeeping Newsletter. His expertise stems from a powerful combination of experience: 7+ years in the biotech industry, a current MBA pursuit at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, and his role as an adjunct professor of Human Anatomy & Physiology. As the President of the Beta Psi Omega National Chapter, Andrei is passionate about student mentorship and guiding the next generation of lifelong learners toward strong career and wellness foundations.
šĀ LinkedIn

